The agreement at the climate summit in Brazil offers no progress. But despite obvious division, 194 relieved countries stuck to climate diplomacy, writes Magnus Bredsdorff in this analysis.

A victory for diplomacy, but for the climate, the gain is almost invisible

Minister for Climate, Energy and Utilities Lars Aagaard (M) had a somewhat mixed last day at the climate summit in Brazil. Foto: Adriano Machado/Ritzau Scanpix
Minister for Climate, Energy and Utilities Lars Aagaard (M) had a somewhat mixed last day at the climate summit in Brazil. Foto: Adriano Machado/Ritzau Scanpix
Listen to the article

It would have been almost unbearable, another diplomatic breakdown. With a world more divided than it has been in decades, and two global agreements meant to protect the planet having crashed earlier this year.

That is precisely why it was logical for the EU to finally give up at this year’s climate summit in Belém, Brazil. Until the final night’s uninterrupted negotiations, Danish Minister for Climate, Energy and Utilities Lars Aagaard (Moderaterne, M), as chair of the union, stood firm on blocking an agreement that did not address the excessively high emissions of greenhouse gases and the fact that countries’ climate plans are nowhere near capable of keeping temperature rises below two degrees. This is the goal of the ten-year-old Paris Agreement, which the summit aims to maintain the credibility of.

Want to keep reading?

Politiken Edition is a curated collection of articles written by our journalists and translated into English. Stay informed on the news – through a Danish lens.

Subscribe now
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Briller

© All material on this page is subject to the applicable copyright law.Read policy